Prescription; Interruption

December 23, 2009
By Dane Ciolino

The Supreme Court concludes that no fault medical payment provision in an insurance policy is payable irrespective of the defendant’s liability in tort, and thus payment of the medical expenses only, without other acts by the insured, does not constitute an acknowledgment of general liability for damages.  Titus v IHOP Restaurant, Inc., No. 09-CC-951 (12/1/09)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

LADC Twitter Posts

Posting tweet...