Recent Developments

Recent developments in tort law, insurance law and legal ethics.

Arbitration

December 24, 2009
By Dane Ciolino

The U.S. Fifth Circuit, en banc, has ruled that the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards is a treaty and not an act of Congress, and it applies to compel a Louisiana self-insurer to arbitrate its dispute with two reinsurance companies despite R.S. 22:629, which bars arbitration agreements in insurance...
Read more »

Posted in Other Developments | No Comments »

Arbitration

December 24, 2009
By Dane Ciolino

Under the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, the arbitrator has the power to require one of the parties to pay the full deposit for the arbitration hearing. Such a ruling is left to the discretion of the arbitrator, and a court should not interfere with it. Dealer Computer Services Inc. v...
Read more »

Posted in Recent Developments | No Comments »

Abandonment

December 24, 2009
By Dane Ciolino

The amendment to CCP Article 561(A)(2) governing abandonment of claims where the failure to take a step in the prosecution or disposition was a direct result of hurricanes Katrina and Rita should not be applied retroactively where the three year period had not run on August 26, 2005, but had tolled before the July...
Read more »

Posted in Other Developments | No Comments »

Prescription; Interruption

December 23, 2009
By Dane Ciolino

The Supreme Court concludes that no fault medical payment provision in an insurance policy is payable irrespective of the defendant’s liability in tort, and thus payment of the medical expenses only, without other acts by the insured, does not constitute an acknowledgment of general liability for damages.  Titus v IHOP Restaurant, Inc., No. 09-CC-951 (12/1/09)
Read more »

Posted in Key Developments | No Comments »

Insurance; Penalties; Discovery

December 23, 2009
By Dane Ciolino

The Fifth (La.) Circuit has concluded that a court may impose penalties under both CCP Arts. 863 and 1471 and under R.S. 22:1220. In the instant case, the court found that the defendant failed to name all relevant insurance policies on discovery, and that the insurer subsequently was found in violation of its duty...
Read more »

Posted in Key Developments | No Comments »

UM Insurance

December 23, 2009
By Dane Ciolino

A person who is not an insured for liability purposes is not an insured for uninsured motorist purposes; a driver who is excluded from liability coverage under an insurance policy, pursuant to R.S. 32:900(L), also is precluded from recovering under the policy’s UM coverage.  Filipski v Imperial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., Supreme Court,...
Read more »

Posted in Key Developments | No Comments »

LADC Twitter Posts