Although insured may not have been able to read the UM waiver form which was printed in English, the insurance agent spoke with insured in Spanish at all relevant times; thus nothing prevented insured from asking questions if he felt he did not understand what he was signing. Held, summary judgment upholding the waiver was proper. Rizzo v Ward, Fourth Circuit, No. 2009-CA-1325 (2/24/10)
LADC Twitter Posts for Week Ending 2010-03-07
Review by iPhoneJD: Louisiana Legal Ethics iPhone App — Free Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct App http://bit.ly/blP2pt #
LADC Twitter Posts for Week Ending 2010-02-28
Louisiana Legal Ethics by Dane Ciolino: There’s an App for That http://bit.ly/12KnZ3 #
Settlement Agreement Releases Defendant’s Employer if No Express Reservation of Rights
A compromise settlement between the plaintiff and the driver, owner and insurer of the offending car provided that plaintiff released “all other persons, firms and corporations” and did not expressly reserve plaintiff’s rights against other defendants. Held, the settlement released the driver’s employer and the employer’s insurer, where there is no allegation that the plaintiff was aware that the tortfeasor was in the course and scope of his employment when the accident occurred. Palmer v Walker, Fifth (La.) Circuit, No. 09-CA-756 (1/12/10).
Summary Judgment Motion Can Rely on Exhibits Already in Record
Deposition testimony filed in the record in connection with an earlier exception may be considered on a subsequent motion for summary judgment; Article 966B does not require that deposition testimony already filed in the record be introduced into evidence at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment. Gatlin v Guy A. Kleinheitz Wheels, Inc., First Circuit, No. 2009 CA 0828 (12/23/09) (Guidry, J, concurs)
UM Coverage and Government-Owned Vehicles
The exclusion of government owned vehicles from uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage thwarts the expressed public policy of the UM statute and is unenforceable. Thus the trial court errs in using the policy language (coverage does not include a vehicle owned by any government or any of its political subdivisions or agencies) to deny coverage. Mednick v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., Fifth (La.) Circuit, No. 09-CA-183 (1/26/10) (five judge court; Rothschild, J, dissenting)
LADC Twitter Posts for Week Ending 2010-01-24
Louisiana Supreme Court Forbids Cash Withdrawals from Lawyer Trust Accounts | Louisiana Legal Ethics http://bit.ly/5soAKz #
16 Simple Rules for Better Jury Selection – The Jury Expert http://bit.ly/4SmIV8 #
LADC Twitter Posts for Week Ending 2010-01-17
New Proposal Would Require Civil Defense Lawyers to Notify Plaintiffs of Settlement | Louisiana Legal Ethics http://bit.ly/6pht25 #
LADC North Louisiana CLE plans finalized. For details and to register, visit: http://bit.ly/8tnDns #
